The 2022 edition of ICD-10-CM S22. 23XK became effective on October 1, 2021. This is the American ICD-10-CM version of S22.
V15. 1 - Personal history of surgery to heart and great vessels, presenting hazards to health. ICD-10-CM.
Other specified postprocedural statesICD-10 code Z98. 89 for Other specified postprocedural states is a medical classification as listed by WHO under the range - Factors influencing health status and contact with health services .
Z86. 79 Personal history of other diseases of the circulatory system - ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes.
Short description: Hx-circulatory dis NOS. ICD-9-CM V12. 50 is a billable medical code that can be used to indicate a diagnosis on a reimbursement claim, however, V12.
R00. 2 Palpitations - ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes.
ICD-10-CM Code for Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on specified body systems Z48. 81.
This is the American ICD-10-CM version of Z98. 89 - other international versions of ICD-10 Z98. 89 may differ.
Personal history of breast implant removal The 2022 edition of ICD-10-CM Z98. 86 became effective on October 1, 2021. This is the American ICD-10-CM version of Z98.
R07. 9 is a billable/specific ICD-10-CM code that can be used to indicate a diagnosis for reimbursement purposes. The 2022 edition of ICD-10-CM R07. 9 became effective on October 1, 2021.
ICD-10-CM Code for Atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) without angina pectoris I25. 810.
4: Abdominal aortic aneurysm, without rupture.
ICD-10 code M43. 22 for Fusion of spine, cervical region is a medical classification as listed by WHO under the range - Dorsopathies .
890 for Other specified postprocedural states is a medical classification as listed by WHO under the range - Factors influencing health status and contact with health services .
The 2022 edition of ICD-10-CM Z95.1 became effective on October 1, 2021.
Z77-Z99 Persons with potential health hazards related to family and personal history and certain conditions influencing health status
However, when there is mediastinitis and sternal osteomyelitis, mortality is high (14–47%).
The median sternotomy is preferred by most cardiothoracic surgeons because it provides optimal exposure and access to the entire heart. It is generally used in patients undergoing an open-heart procedure who also require ICD implantation (Fig. 21-77 ). The median sternotomy results in less pain and optimal exposure. 176
21-80 ). This approach can be used in patients who have had prior cardiac surgery. 189,190 In essence, the subcostal approach improves exposure over the subxiphoid approach while minimizing pulmonary complications and problems.
Median Sternotomy. The median sternotomy remains the primary approach for most patients undergoing valve surgery. Median sternotomy is the only viable approach for those undergoing concomitant bypass grafting; it provides direct access to all important cardiovascular structures, and valve exposure is usually excellent.
The patches are then sutured to the pericardium (or, in the case of an intrapericardial implant, directly on the surfaces of the ventricles). The median sternotomy approach for ICD placement is the procedure of choice of most cardiothoracic surgeons.
Prior median sternotomy is neither an absolute nor a relative contraindication to the implantation of CIEDs. Many patients who have previously undergone open heart surgery require and benefit from device therapy. Special consideration must be given to patients with central venous stenosis, prior right atrial appendage ligation, and a requirement for lead tunneling. Central venous stenosis can result from the placement of multiple indwelling central catheters or ligation of the left brachiocephalic vein (for optimal exposure of the aortic arch vessels) during cardiac surgery. Right atrial appendage ligation is common in open heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (a common site for placement of the venous cannula) and thus requires placement of a right atrial lead in an alternate location, typically the lateral right atrium (Fig. 12.1 ). Although tunneling leads from the right infraclavicular area to the left infraclavicular area (or vice versa) is not recommended, it should particularly be avoided in patients with prior median sternotomy. The sternotomy wires can potentially abrade the CIED leads and result in impaired durability and function.
Median sternotomy can be hazardous during reoperation. Massive hemorrhage can occur when thin-walled vascular structures are adherent to the posterior sternum. Computed tomography (CT) scans provide retrosternal images that anticipate potential complications and assist in planning (see Chapter 7 ). If the aorta, right atrium, or a conduit is adherent to the sternum, the femoral artery and vein can be exposed before sternotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass initiated with thin-walled cannulae for femoral artery and vein. Aortic regurgitation may require decompression of the left ventricle, accomplished by cannulating the apex through a small submammary incision. In cyanotic patients, excessive bleeding can be expected because of large vessels throughout the mediastinum, increased tissue vascularity, and inherent hemostatic defects (see Chapter 12 ). Antifibrinolytic agents are used in high-risk patients.
Median sternotomy is a type of surgical procedure in which a vertical inline incision is made along the sternum, after which the sternum itself is divided, or "cracked".
Median sternotomy is often mistakenly referred to as open heart surgery, in which it is a preliminary step. However, open heart additionally involves incision of the pericardium, and many median sternotomy procedures do not require this. Open heart usually involves the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass, also known as a heart-lung machine.
Sternal wound infection (SWI) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a challenging complication of the median sternotomy surgical approach. A comprehensive definition of SWI is described by El Oakley and Wright. 1 They describe mediastinal wound infection as “clinical or microbiological evidence of infected presternal tissue and sternal osteomyelitis with or without mediastinal sepsis and with or without unstable sternum.” 2 The incidence of SWI reported in the literature varies, generally ranging from 0.4 to 4 percent. 3-13 Despite being a relatively infrequent event, SWI following median sternotomy carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality and is a potentially important indicator of care quality and patient safety. Defining which ICD codes accurately identify SWI cases in large administrative databases is helpful for tracking quality of care and monitoring interventions aimed at improving complication rates and patient safety.
Hebden describes using ICD-9-CM coding for the identification of SWI cases. 32 The ICD-9-CM code 998.59 was used to identify deep SWI cases, and the authors report 100 percent sensitivity and 98 percent specificity using this code. Huang et al. used ICD-9-CM codes through Medicare claims to track surgical site infections following CABG. 33 They report that a post-CABG surgical site infection was confirmed with chart review 40 percent of the time when cases were identified as having an infection using ICD-9-CM codes. This finding is comparable to the PPV we report using ICD-10 codes (35.7 percent using T81.3 or T81.4). We acknowledge that the lower PPV in the study by Huang et al. was due to the inclusion of a much larger set of diagnosis codes than used in this study. We feel the results described in our work serve as an update to these studies for the ICD-10 coding system. As coding practices may vary, the use of ICD-10 codes to identify SWI cases should not be used as a safety indicator unless the definition is validated with chart review. However, monitoring the incidence of SWI in the same hospital is still a useful exercise because it can identify trends and can be important in patient safety. The proposed definition also offers clinicians and researchers a method of identifying possible cases of SWI (and subtype deep SWI) with reasonable accuracy that is comparable to methods previously described for ICD-9 coding (above).
The ICD-10-CM Alphabetical Index links the below-listed medical terms to the ICD code Z95.1. Click on any term below to browse the alphabetical index.
This is the official exact match mapping between ICD9 and ICD10, as provided by the General Equivalency mapping crosswalk. This means that in all cases where the ICD9 code V45.81 was previously used, Z95.1 is the appropriate modern ICD10 code.