Spontaneous ecchymoses. R23.3 is a billable/specific ICD-10-CM code that can be used to indicate a diagnosis for reimbursement purposes. The 2020 edition of ICD-10-CM R23.3 became effective on October 1, 2019.
"Spontaneous human combustion" refers to the death from a fire originating without an apparent external source of ignition; a belief that the fire starts within the body of the victim.
Diagnosis Index entries containing back-references to R23.3: ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code R23.9 Petechia, petechiae R23.3 Purpuric spots R23.3 ICD-10-CM Codes Adjacent To R23.3 Reimbursement claims with a date of service on or after October 1, 2015 require the use of ICD-10-CM codes.
813 Coagulation disorders. Diagnosis Index entries containing back-references to R23.3: ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code R23.9 Petechia, petechiae R23.3 Purpuric spots R23.3 ICD-10-CM Codes Adjacent To R23.3 Reimbursement claims with a date of service on or after October 1, 2015 require the use of ICD-10-CM codes.
For well over a century, some have claimed that people can suddenly and inexplicably explode into a ball of fire. The phenomenon is called spontaneous human combustion (SHC), and it has been described in many popular books on mysteries and the unexplained.
The answer is almost certainly no. None of the proposed scientific explanations for how a body would spontaneously burst into flames have held up to scrutiny.
December 2010In December 2010, the death of Michael Faherty, a 76-year-old man in County Galway, Ireland, was recorded as "spontaneous combustion" by the coroner.
Michael Faherty, 76, died at his home in Galway on 22 December 2010. Deaths attributed by some to "spontaneous combustion" occur when a living human body is burned without an apparent external source of ignition. Typically police or fire investigators find burned corpses but no burned furniture.
Fans defended them by pointing to a long list of reported cases. The scientific community, however, remained skeptical and has continued to regard with suspicion the 200 or so cases that have been reported worldwide.
Fewer than 150 cases of spontaneous human combustion have been reported over the last two thousand years. The rareness has rightfully engendered skepticism as to whether the condition truly exists. After all, the human body is approximately sixty percent water. It's simply not flammable.
Quite often the peripheral bones of the hands and feet will not be burned to such a high intensity as those at the centre of the body, where most fat is located.
According to Ford, a buildup of acetone in the body (which can result from alcoholism, diabetes or a specific kind of diet) can lead to spontaneous combustion.
Spontaneous CombustionCoal Mine.Thermoelectrics.Lithium.Lignite.Ignition.Low-Temperature.Sulfur.Autoignition.More items...
Your skin thus is not flammable. Human skin does have a flashpoint, with a flashpoint referring to the lowest temperature required for ignition. The flashpoint of your skin is 1,600 degrees, as we touched on in the intro. Even in the hottest conditions, the temperatures are nowhere high enough to ignite your skin.
It is confirmed in the series that it is the servants of the Evangelist who are at least partially the cause. Spontaneous Human Combustion occurs due to the encroachment of a persons doppelganger, their counterpart that exists in the world of Adolla, into their human world counterparts body in the physical world.
KrookIn Bleak House a character dies via an unusual method — spontaneous combustion. The unfortunate character to meet this fate is Krook, the brother of Mrs. Smallweed. George Henry Lewes, a writer for the Leader, complained in his February 1853 column that people just didn't suddenly burst into flame.
In the 80s, television and movie characters often faced the threat of death by sinking into quicksand. It turns out that it’s virtually impossible to actually die this way…but it can’t hurt to keep an eye out for low-hanging vines.
According to the National Weather Service, the odds of getting struck by lightning are about 1 in 1,222,000, but the threat seemed far more imminent growing up.
Blame it on shlocky TV and grocery line tabloids, but the fear of random tarantula encounters was real. This UK grandmother – appropriately named Gillian Shivers – found one in a bag of grapes just a couple of years back.
All roads lead to the 1983 release of Cujo for this one. The television ads – featuring a rabid and rampaging St. Bernard – were enough to make every neighborhood dog suspicious.
Unchecked air pollution from refineries, power plants, vehicles – you name it – transformed the childhood joys of splashing in puddles and getting soaked in a downpour into fears of burning skin and melted rubber boots.
The threat of an anaphylactic reaction to a regular bee sting is far more grave and realistic than being attacked by a swarm of killer bees. But any self-respecting child of the 80s would beg to differ.
Shows like Ripley’s Believe It Or Not! and That’s Incredible! made it seem like spontaneous combustion was happening all the time. And who were we to doubt them and those emphatic exclamation marks!
This idea and the term "spontaneous human combustion" were both first proposed in 1746 by Paul Rolli, a Fellow of the Royal Society, in an article published in the Philosophical Transactions concerning the mysterious death of Countess Cornelia Zangheri Bandi.
The doctor, Ciaran McLoughlin, made this statement at the inquiry into the death: "This fire was thoroughly investigated and I'm left with the conclusion that this fits into the category of spontaneous human combustion, for which there is no adequate explanation.".
Spontaneous human combustion ( SHC) is the pseudoscientific concept of the combustion of a living (or recently deceased) human body without an apparent external source of ignition. In addition to reported cases, descriptions of the alleged phenomenon appear in literature, and both types have been observed to share common characteristics in terms ...
Larry E. Arnold in his 1995 book Ablaze! proposed a pseudoscientific new subatomic particle, which he called "pyrotron". Arnold also wrote that the flammability of a human body could be increased by certain circumstances, like increased alcohol in the blood. He further proposed that extreme stress could be the trigger that starts many combustions. This process may use no external oxygen to spread throughout the body, since it may not be an " oxidation-reduction " reaction; however, no reaction mechanism has been proposed. Researcher Joe Nickell has criticised Arnold's hypotheses as based on selective evidence and argument from ignorance.
the body has not burned spontaneously, but some lighted substance has come into contact with it; the hands and feet usually fall off; the fire has caused very little damage to combustible things in contact with the body; the combustion of the body has left a residue of greasy and fetid ashes, very offensive in odour.".
While scientific consensus is that incidents which might appear as spontaneous combustion did in fact have an external source of ignition— and that the physical possibility of spontaneous human combustion without an external ignition source is extremely implausible—some pseudoscientific hypotheses have been presented which attempt to explain how SHC might occur without an external flame source. Benjamin Radford, science writer and deputy editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer, casts doubt on the plausibility of spontaneous human combustion: "If SHC is a real phenomenon (and not the result of an elderly or infirm person being too close to a flame source), why doesn't it happen more often? There are 5 billion people in the world [ today in 1987 ], and yet we don't see reports of people bursting into flame while walking down the street, attending football games, or sipping a coffee at a local Starbucks." Paranormal researcher Brian Dunning states that SHC stories "are simply the rare cases where a natural death in isolation has been followed by a slow combustion from some nearby source of ignition." He further suggested that reports of people suddenly aflame should be called "unsolved deaths by fire", stating that an unknown cause did not necessarily imply that the fire lacked an external ignition source.