Nov 27, 2018 · Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) infection is a type of bacterial infection.S. maltophilia is found mostly in wet environments. In the hospital setting, S. maltophilia can be found in fluids, such as irrigation solutions (fluids used to clean a wound or wash out a body cavity like the ear canal or bladder) and intravenous (IV) fluids, as well as patient …
Jan 17, 2022 · Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: ... Ninth Revision diagnosis codes 481, 485, 486, 514; or ICD, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes J18.0, J18.1, J18.2, J18.8, J18.9. Day –1 …
A GToTree v1.5.47 phylogenomic analysis using 172 gammaproteobacterium single-copy genes in 204 S. maltophilia reference strains and Stenotrophomonas pictorum JCM 9942 as an outgroup suggested that S. maltophilia 1800 belongs …
Burns of 10-19% of body surfc w 0% to 9% third degree burns; Burn any degree involving 10-19 percent of body surface; Burn any degree involving 10-19 percent of body surface with third degree burn less than 10 percent of body surface; Burn injury; Burns involving 10 …
maltophilia experience infections of the heart (endocarditis), the bone behind the ear (mastoiditis), lining of the abdomen and internal organs (peritonitis), cerebral spinal fluid ( meningitis ), soft tissue , wounds, urinary tract, and/or eye. The symptoms are similar to other bacterial infections of the same sites.
Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacillus that is an opportunistic pathogen [1-4], particularly among hospitalized patients. S. maltophilia infections have been associated with high morbidity and mortality in severely immunocompromised and debilitated individuals.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen that was transferred from the genus Pseudomonas via the Xanthomonas group to the newly defined genus Stenotrophomonas.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SMA) is a non-fermenting gram-negative bacillus found in plants and soil and on the surface of human skin. It is present in hospital environments and is detected in the respiratory and intestinal tracts.Dec 21, 2019
The treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have in vitro activity against S.
S. maltophilia is an environmental bacterium found in aqueous habitats, including plant rhizospheres, animals, foods, and water sources. Infections of S. maltophilia can occur in a range of organs and tissues; the organism is commonly found in respiratory tract infections.
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates on MacConkey agarScientific classificationDomain:BacteriaPhylum:Pseudomonadota10 more rows
maltophilia causes various infectious complications in immunocompromised individuals and these include bacteremia, endocarditis, respiratory tract infections, meningitis, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, mastoiditis, bone and joint infections, peritonitis, typhlitis and biliary sepsis, wound ...Aug 25, 2014
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an aerobic, Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium of the Xanthomonadaceae family. It may trigger urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection or bloodstream infection.
The susceptibility of 20 clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem was investigated by various methods. S. maltophilia appeared sensitive to meropenem but resistant to imipenem by disc testing in Iso-sensitest agar.
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) The mainstay of treatment for Stenotrophomonas infections is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and it remains the current drug of choice.Oct 9, 2021
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia represents the fourth most common pathogen among nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria (following Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp, and Burkholderia cepacia complex), with a reported incidence of 7.1 to 37.7 cases/10 000 discharges (regarding nosocomial infections)20.Aug 15, 2019
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered first-line therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections based on observational data from small studies. Levofloxacin has emerged as a popular alternative due to tolerability concerns related to TMP-SMX. Data comparing levofloxacin to TMP-SMX as targeted therapy are lacking.
The Cerner Healthfacts database was queried for unique adult (≥18 years) inpatient encounters admitted between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017 that recorded growth of S maltophilia in ≥1 blood or lower respiratory tract culture. The latter included sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage, and protected bronchial brush washings.
Between 2005 and 2017, there were 14 930 unique inpatients at 154 hospitals in the United States with any culture positive for S maltophilia in the database. After applying selection criteria ( Figure 1 ), 1581 assessable inpatients were identified: 823 (52%) inpatients in the levofloxacin cohort and 758 (48%) in the TMP-SMX cohort.
Our study of 1581 patients from 154 US hospitals represents the largest retrospective cohort analysis thus far comparing the effectiveness of levofloxacin vs TMP-SMX as targeted therapy for S maltophilia bloodstream and lower respiratory tract infections.
Our large study of overlap-weighted cohorts of patients treated with levofloxacin vs TMP-SMX for S maltophilia LRTIs and BSIs suggest that levofloxacin might be a reasonable alternative to the current accepted standard TMP-SMX for these infections. An RCT comparing levofloxacin and TMP-SMX head-to-head is yet to be performed.
Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions. S. S. K. conceived the study. S. H. S. and S. S. K. designed the study, conducted the literature search, and wrote the draft of the manuscript. S. H. S., S. W., and S. S. K. collected and analyzed the data. S. H. S., S. W., S. S. K., R. M., and V. G. F. interpreted the data.